Monday, November 25, 2024
Advertisement
Home Blog Page 25

EPB Seeks Community Input and Submissions for Fourth and Final 10th Street Mural

EPB is seeking community input and submissions for the fourth and final installment of its 10th Street Mural Project. The project began in 2020, offering local artists an opportunity to share their talent on each side of EPB’s 10th Street substation wall.

Community members are encouraged to spread the word to local artists and encourage them to submit their work.

An outside group of community stakeholders will use an anonymous judging process to select artists who live or work in EPB’s service territory based on the submission’s artistic value, community reflection and thematic relevance.

A tentative timeline of the mural process is as follows:

January 2024: Call for artist submissions (must be at least 18, and live or work in EPB’s service territory. First time muralists are welcome to apply)

February 2024: Select artists

March 2024: Announce selected artists

April 2024: Begin work

May 2024: End work

Thursday, June 13, 2024: Mural celebration event

Murals showcased on the Foster and E. 10th Streets sides of EPB’s 10th Street substation wall over the last three years honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Chattanooga history and well-known Chattanooga community members.

EPB is a locally owned and operated electric power and utility company serving Chattanooga and Hamilton County, Tennessee. The company provides electricity to over 160,000 customers. For further information on the 10th Street Mural Project, contact Vanessa Willis with EPB at willisvm@epb.net.

Hamilton County Kindergarteners Get Ready to Discover! Free Passes Are Yours!

0

Hamilton County Mayor Weston Wamp announced that kindergarten students enrolled in the Hamilton County Public Schools will receive four unlimited passes per student to the Children’s Discovery Museum as part of the County’s commitment to a lifetime of learning.

The unique program will bring the funding from the County Mayor’s budget approved by the County Commission, distribution efforts within the Hamilton County Public Schools, and the open door of discovery and educational fun provided by the immersion experience of the Children’s Discovery Museum.

“The future of our county will be defined by how well we serve our youngest citizens today, and this partnership will give every kindergartener in our community an equal opportunity to experience our world-class Creative Discovery Museum,” Hamilton County Mayor Weston Wamp said. “My hope is that as families are adjusting to the first year of elementary school, they are able to use these passes to spend quality time playing and learning together.”

Almost 4,000 families of kindergarten students in the county will receive passes that will be honored during the 2023-2024 school year, through June 30 at the facility located at 321 Chestnut Street.

“More learning takes place in early childhood than any other time in a person’s life, and caregiver interaction multiplies the impact,” observed Claire Stockman, vice president of Education at the interactive museum. “We at Creative Discovery Museum are proud to create a space where learners of all ages can explore, innovate, create, and play together. This wonderful partnership with Hamilton County will give access to the museum to all HCS kindergarteners and their caregivers and we can’t wait to witness the learning, growing, and relationship-building that will build strong foundations and support classroom learning for the rest of these students’ school careers.”

Kindergarten students will be presented with the passes within the next few weeks. Families wanting to plan their visit should visit https://www.cdmfun.org/visit for times of operation, parking and information about free shuttles which run throughout downtown, other details relative to the visit. HCS Superintendent Justin Robertson noted, “Education is a shared responsibility, and the district’s commitment to collaboration with community partners continues to provide opportunities for students and families to explore learning interests and find resources. We look forward to our students enjoying this premier interactive learning experience.”

EDUCATION TASK FORCE HEARS MORE CONSEQUENCES OF REJECTING FEDERAL DOLLARS

0

NASHVILLE—A public policy research center today (Tuesday, Nov 7) warned state lawmakers that cutting programs or raising taxes are potential consequences of refusing more than a billion dollars in education funds from the federal government.  The Sycamore Institute today told a joint legislative committee that those are two possible options if they follow through on a Republican proposal to reject federal education dollars and state revenues continue to shrink.

The Joint Working Group on Federal Education Funding held its second day of meetings today.  House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lieutenant Governor Randy McNally created the task force to examine replacing federal education dollars with state funds because federal dollars come with “strings” attached.

However, the Sycamore Institute told the panel that because no state has ever rejected federal K-12 funding much is unknown. But some of the possible ramifications could include budget cuts or tax increases during a shortfall or recession, extended court battles over federal requirements that may still exist for state schools even if funding is refused and Tennesseans having to pay federal income taxes on money now going to other states.

In the afternoon session, a cross-sexton of county school superintendents told the panel that even with the federal education dollars they still don’t have enough money to repair school roofs and they have to send children to learn in buildings that are more than 100 years old and falling apart. 

Following the meeting, State Representative Ronnie Glynn of Clarksville, who is one of only two Democrats serving on the Task Force, said that after today, he’s not sure why the committee is continuing to meet: “We are telling school superintendents that we can replace the billion dollars the federal government provides with state money when they have buildings crumbling around them. Instead of replacing federal dollars, we could take the matching billion that we say we have and use it to fix their buildings and hire more teachers. We are literally asking them how they could repurpose existing employees who have to fill out federal paperwork, when we could just give them the money to hire more teachers and retain the teachers they have.  It doesn’t make a lot of sense.” The committee meets again tomorrow at 9:00 AM in Senate Hearing Room one.  Officials with the U.S. Department of Education and the National Conference of State Legislatures are scheduled to make presentations.

REPUBLICANS SHOW COST TO THE STATE OF LOSING FEDERAL EDUCATION DOLLARS

0

NASHVILLE—State agencies laid out today how Tennessee could refuse more than a billion dollars for public schools…and how the hardest hit would be in rural Tennessee counties…if Republicans follow through on their proposal to reject over $1.8 billion of federal education funds.

At the first meeting of a joint legislative task force examining whether the state should refuse to accept federal education grants, officials with the Comptroller’s Office said Tennessee is allocated $1.9 billion dollars from the Federal Government this year.  The bulk of that money is passed along to each county’s Local Education Agencies.  Last year, the largest percentage of those funds went to rural counties to supplement their education budgets. The top three were Hancock (31%), Campbell (30.58%), and Benton (29.87) Counties.  The Comptroller’s office said the money is primarily used for poor and disadvantaged students, children with disabilities, school nutrition programs and career and technical education. 

Following the meeting, State Representative Ronnie Glynn, who serves on the Task Force, questioned how Tennessee would be able to replace those dollars, particularly more than $280 million from the USDA helps feed disadvantaged students: “We all know we have to provide our children with the tools needed to receive a quality education and that includes making sure our students are fed so they have the capacity to learn. When I asked how will our kids eat if these funds go away, I was asking for my Montgomery County children, as well as those in Hancock, Campbell, Benton and my home county of Lauderdale. Those counties are depending on those nutrition dollars to help feed their children.”

In addition to the possible loss of more than a billion dollars in federal education funding, the Task Force today also heard from the Fiscal Review Committee on how rejecting the education dollars could jeopardize other federal funds like TANF money and possibly lead to potential federal fines for non-compliance under the Social Security Act. The Joint Working Group on Federal Education Funding continues five days of meetings tomorrow at 9:00 AM in Senate Hearing Room one.

Straddling the tightrope!

0

“Uncomfortable lessons are the ones that teach us most about ourselves.” – Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

I offer that quote as a lead-in to what follows.

You see, “damn if I do, damn if I don’t” was the “should I or should I not” tightrope I found myself inching my way across as I grappled with the decision or not to weigh in on the Israel-Hamas war.

If I don’t write about it, what could that suggest about me, a dude who prides himself on tackling controversial issues? “Coward,” “spineless” or “complicit” are adjectives I don’t exactly relish being strapped with. “Courageous,” yes, has a much better feel for me.

Wanna know what else has fueled my anxiety? Well, it seemed that every time I tried to put pen to paper on this issue, breaking news of sporadic, bigoted vandalism of mosques and synagogues were reported. Plus, rushed written statements from college administrations across the nation got blistering complaints from student protestors that those statements were too milquetoast, too strong, or just too one sided.  

Wrote columnist Frank Bruni, “For the past two and a half weeks, college leaders have canceled or anxiously discussed canceling campus speeches and events that touch on Israel and Palestine. They’ve agonized over the wording of official school statements about the Oct. 7 massacre in Israel and, in some cases, issued second statements to amend, augment or atone for the first ones.

Students, meanwhile, have blasted those administrators for saying too much or too little. They’ve complained about feeling stranded. They’ve demanded more protection.”

But the truth is that I’ve already put my backside out there when I recently wrote about my Jewish friend’s daughter who lives in, but thankfully, survived the October 7th attack on Israel. At the end of that one, and not expecting much, I requested readers to connect me with anyone they knew who lives in Palestine so that I could get an alternative perspective. 

So after a few days of no takers, I finally received a response from “Tanya” a Muslim lady. Here’s a snapshot of her message to me:

“Thanks for your new article, Terry. It provides a first-hand perspective that’s important and I think that you will find much to resonate with those on both sides of the conflict.” She then listed an Egyptian individual I could reach out to plus articles that would deepen my knowledge of others, Palestinians in particular. As I sort through it all, the most meaningful was the highly informative article, “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Timeline.”

What I learned from reaching out and getting more balanced information than I expected was the realization that I have so much to learn about the history of that conflict. I learned about my assumptions and gaps in my own knowledge. I also learned how important it is to be inquisitive.

Now the point I’d like to make is simple; sometimes there are unexpected benefits when you take the risk and step out of your comfort zone in search of other experiences and perspectives.

Thus, this takes me to a number of questions I was left with, chief among them, if I write about my Jewish friend “Ed,” as I did recently, does that make me anti-Palestine? Conversely, if I write about the plight of Palestinians, does that make me antisemitic?

Viewed in other contexts, if I write about race, as I sometimes do, does that make me racist against non-Blacks? If I write about women, does that make me anti-men? If I say, “Black lives matter,” do I mean that white lives don’t matter? Of course not. The absurdity of any one of those propositions is laughable. 

So agree with me or not, this conflict should not be a tic for tac, or either/or proposition. To me the focus must be on basic humanity and the desire for peace, safety, and survival no matter what side of the issue – or border – on which you currently reside.

But don’t get me wrong, don’t take me to task before hearing me out. This is not to ignore the history of the conflict, the truth of the savage attack by thugs on Israel on October 7th or the thousands of lives snuffed out in both Palestine and Israel since then. Sure, easier said than done, but the challenge is to acknowledge those realities yet humanize those on either side of the conflict as real people rather than depict them as saints or villains. Think about it this way – it’s hard to argue with someone else’s personal experience, with their lives and what they’ve seen through their own eyes if you see them as individuals and not through images of them on the front page of a tabloid in the grocery store checkout line.

So, my parting advice is this: as the Israel-Hamas war continues to unfold into a wider regional conflict, no matter how bleak, challenge yourself to read media sources different from your usual ones. Better still, put aside that PC or turn off that remote control and develop relationships with those you never considered. 

In the end, and to Justice Brown’s point, when I write about thorny issues, including the one you’re now reading, in doing so I learn much about the “man in the mirror,” his illusions about the knowledge he thinks he has, and the learning and unlearning he must do.

And guess what? By no stretch of the imagination am I alone.

“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge.” – Stephan Hawking

Terry Howard is an award-winning trainer, writer, and storyteller. He is a contributing writer with the Chattanooga News Chronicle, The American Diversity Report, The Douglas County Sentinel, Blackmarket.com, co-founder of the “26 Tiny Paint Brushes” writers guild, recipient of the 2019 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Leadership Award, and third place winner of the 2022 Georgia Press Award.

Portraits Of Noah Parden and Styles Hutchins Unveiled at Joel W. Solomon Building 

Chattanooga – The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee unveiled portraits of Noah Parden and Styles Hutchins in a ceremony Wednesday, November 1st at the Joel W. Solomon Federal Building and United States Courthouse.

Officials said, “Mr. Parden and Mr. Hutchins, two African American attorneys from Chattanooga, obtained a stay of execution in 1906 for Ed Johnson, an African American criminal defendant, in the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Johnson had been wrongfully convicted of raping a white woman in a Hamilton County state court. 

From left, Elijah Cameron; Linda Moss Mines; Judge Travis McDonough; and Eric Atkins. (Photo: CNC-Faye Stoudemire)

Charles Atchley, US District Judge opened the ceremony and read the bio of Parden and Hutchins and US District Judge Curtis L. Collier gave a moving overview of the impact both men made on decisions of the Supreme Court.  It was the first time in the Supreme Court’s history that it intervened in a city court’s case and gave a stay of execution.  Despite the stay of execution, a mob forced its way into the county jail where Mr. Johnson was held, and hanged him from the Walnut Street bridge. 

“Although Mr. Johnson’s lynching was an unimaginable tragedy in Chattanooga’s history, Mr. Parden and Mr. Hutchins’ courageous defense of Johnson—at great personal cost—merits the public’s honor.” 

The portraits will be displayed prominently just outside the third-floor courtroom of the Joel W. Solomon Federal Building and United States Courthouse. 

At the unveiling, the Court, in partnership with the Supreme Court Historical Society also announced The Supreme Court and My Hometown program for Chattanooga, a two-week summer day camp for local high school students.  

“The Hometowns program engages high school students in an intensive study of the process and substantive issues of cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a unique and personalized way,” officials said. “During the Chattanooga program, students will learn about Ed Johnson’s case and United States v. Shipp, the only criminal trial ever conducted by the Supreme Court, which resulted in a finding that the Hamilton County Sheriff and five other individuals were guilty of contempt for not enforcing the Supreme Court’s stay of execution.  

“The program also encourages students to interact with their community based on what they have learned throughout their study, and at the end of Hometowns, students will create a capstone project on the impact of these cases.” 

One Westside Update – Survey Says Majority of Residents Want to Return

City Council Chair Raquetta Dotley

Chattanooga City Council Chairwoman Raquetta Dotley summed up this week’s One Westside update in the October 24 agenda session in terms that contrast vividly to those made during the initial September presentation. Stating the obvious, Dotley noted, “Our last meeting was a little tense,” but concluding with “Overall, I am very pleased with the outcome…”

So, what provoked such a turnabout of events?

The Chattanooga Housing Authority took its marching orders from a very vocal and unmoved Council after the initial presentation on September 26 that utilized three-year old, incomplete data. Preferences of residents of the Gateway Towers and College Hill Courts presented were based on assumptions and projections, rather than a promised survey to address the complex transition of building, relocation, demolition, construction, and return to new units in the massive multi-year redevelopment project tethered to the major development project at The Bend.

A new survey was conducted by CHA of Gateway residents, predominantly seniors, and those of College Hill Courts. The questions asked revealed how many wanted to continue living downtown onsite as the demolition and redevelopment occurred versus those who wanted a Housing Choice voucher to find rental housing or live in a CHA-managed property.

A second question asked how many residents wanted to return to the redeveloped subsidized housing that was first built 83 years ago. Finally, at the insistence of the Council, a new question was added to understand residents’ long-term homeownership desires.

The goal of CHA was to survey 75% of Gateway Towers residents and 75% of College Hill Courts (CHC) residents. At the Gateway Towers 73% of residents were surveyed, with visits attempted five times.

Seventy-seven percent of Gateway residents surveyed want to remain downtown throughout the entire tenure of the project, and 80% plan to return. CHC respondents indicated that 47% want to remain onsite as demolition and redevelopment occur, with 82% wanting to return upon the completion of new units.

Looking at the question of aspiring to own a home, 65% of respondents at CHC indicated their desire to move out of the need of tax-payer subsidized housing to their own home.

Again, Chairman Dotley praised the new information and availability of one-on-one advisors to counsel and educate residents over the course of time on the process of homeownership, noting that the answer to the homeownership question changes the “narrative about people in College Hill Courts.”

Councilwoman Dotley, whose district holds both the Westside and The Bend properties, continued, “People have ambitions. Everybody doesn’t have a father or mother who left them property or a way to navigate certain circumstances…”

As the critical window approaches for the final reading of the very intricate resolution filled with amendments, funding sources, budgets, projected timelines, and moving parts, the tone and temperature of this Agenda Session presentation appears to spell good news for a generational project to move forward that may reflect the Chattanooga Way from day’s past where all benefit.

Nashville Stars Meets Chattanooga Leaders

LOOKS TO BRING Major League Baseball to Tennessee 

NASHVILLE, TN — The Nashville Stars recently visited Chattanooga to meet with area business and community leaders and to share updates on our progress.  

Board member Dave Stewart joined community engagement and operations manager Mia Vickers to visit with Mayors Weston Wamp and Tim Kelly, the Chattanooga Chamber, the Chattanooga Lookouts, TVA, and Hinton & Company to share news about the Stars’ work to bring Major League Baseball to Tennessee. 

Their visit shined a light on the Hamilton County market, its growth, and its continuing impact on Tennessee tourism and the region’s economy. It’s another example of how the Stars will be a team that the entire state of Tennessee can support and be proud of. 

Chattanooga is a focal point of Hamilton County, the fifth fastest-growing county (by population) in the state, thanks to a 1.5% year-over-year growth.  

And just like we’ve recently shown with Nashville’s extensive tourism revenue last year, Hamilton County produced more than its fair share. The 2022 Economic Impact of Travel on Tennessee report by the Tennessee Department of Tourist Development revealed that the county generated more than $1.62 billion in domestic visitor spending in 2022, an 8% increase from 2021 and likewise the fifth-highest total in the state.  

“Tennessee is thriving as tourism continues to soar,” Tennessee Department of Tourist Development commissioner Mark Ezell said in a statement last month. “Our industry’s hard work is paying off with record levels of visitor spending and significantly outpacing inflation.”  

That income was beneficial for the county in a variety of ways. First, direct visitor spending generated almost $167.8 million in state and local tax revenue. It also saved $1,138 in state and local taxes for each Hamilton County household while also supporting more than 12,000 jobs within the county.  

“Hamilton County’s remarkable growth in local tourism stands as a testament to our industry’s unwavering dedication towards becoming the nation’s most competitive destination,” Chattanooga Convention and Visitors Bureau president and CEO Barry White said in a news release in September. “The economic vitality fueled by tourism creates jobs, supports local businesses and funds community projects, all of which contribute to making Hamilton County an even better place to call home.”   The city of Nashville and the Nashville Stars celebrate the tremendous growth and continued appeal of Hamilton County and the city of Chattanooga, which adds appeal for the Stars’ wide-ranging fan base: in Nashville, throughout the state and across the country. 

Redistricting Battlegrounds in Three Southern States

0

While the recent US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision in Alabama regarding redistricting, created a new Black opportunity district that would enable Black voters to elect the candidate of their choice, other Southern states have seen backsliding on the principle of one person, one vote. States across the Southeast are going for broke […] 

In the otherwise middling midterms of 2022, North Carolina lost their Democratic majority on their Supreme Court.  A few months into the new legislative term, the North Carolina Supreme Court summarily reversed the previous court’s decision that banned partisan gerrymandering. In a 5-2 decision in April the Court found “We hold that partisan gerrymandering claims present a political question that is nonjusticiable under the North Carolina Constitution” eliminating court oversight of gerrymandering.  

Moving forward to October, with one Democrat flipping parties to Republicans giving the North Carolina state legislature a veto-proof majority, a mid-decade redistricting was complete, possibly eliminating four currently seated Democratic congressional representatives in next year’s election.  

In South Carolina, the US Supreme Court seemed far more skeptical of racial gerrymandering claims than they were in Alabama in oral arguments on October 11. Justice John Roberts seemed particularly concerned that there was no direct evidence of racial bias, while Justice Ketanji Jackson and the Court’s other liberals noted that all the evidence pointed to race being the predominate factor. The US Supreme Court is expected to rule on the South Carolina case by July 2024.  

The lower courts ordered Louisiana to draw a new Black opportunity district, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the decision, and the US Supreme Court upheld that stay in an unsigned order on October 19. There was no dissent noted, although Justice Jackson did leave open the possibility that they may order the drawing at a later date.   With multiple pending lawsuits, victories and defeats in the redistricting battle, the decisions in the South Carolina, Louisiana and Florida gerrymandering cases will play a role in who controls the US House of Representatives in January 2025.  (by Ivan Sanchez)